It’s kind of a bonkers question because they are different technologies with different use cases only related in that they were both used for entertainment. It’s almost like “how did trains survive the invention of airplanes?” (or boats and planes).
The linked article isn’t from Andy though…
Even worse is the wealth of knowledge that exists in random discord servers…
At some point, we didn’t even notice, we stopped building a library. :(
I really worry about this. It is not my area of expertise by any means. I assume that it is acceptable at coding because the people making it have shoved every line of code they could scrape from the internet (and probably other places) into it. So it can reproduce approximate code to do anything that has been done before. But I worry it can’t do anything in a new way. It can’t innovate. If no one is writing code that is able to actually think about the code and understand how code works, then we as a species can’t innovate anymore either. If it all goes LLM, then we’ve built every lego shape we will ever make and anything we build from now on has to be able to be built from the bricks we already have.
I worry we are watching the early stages of a technological dark age wash over society.
A maga piece of shit sucking off the AI bubble with both hands AND being a worthless abusive boss? I am shocked… Well, not that shocked.
If they pull the private equity BS, door dash will make loads while instacart posts nothing but losses ‘for unknown reasons, probably just a downturn in the market or something’.
Or they are going to do the typical private equity thing and transfer the debt to instacart as soon as they are acquired and then use the debt as an excuse for instacart to go bankrupt in a few years (or months) and walk away one competitor less in the market.
I have not… So… Disco-titties?
My brain immediately went to cybernetic titties and I got lost thinking about what they might do.
I’ve assumed this is the case the entire time. It got fed every last shred of code anyone could get their hands on because coding is the only industry they have anyone inside convinced that AI is a great (or even good) thing.
Better than an LG or Samsung, but unfortunately not a “dumb TV”. Runs Android 9, which is a red flag itself in 2026 for an internet connected device.
They claim GPL 3 license but the whole thing was written by a chat bot, so can they even pretend they own it instead Anthropic? I’d be interested to see how that would play out if challenged.
Test Drive 5 and Hades. Two musical awakenings about 25 years apart.
Both have fantastic sound tracks, but also wildly different.
That sounds like a pretty good deal to me…
What benefit? This is the “Fuck AI” community and you are reacting to the comment section on what basically amounts to a meme as though the commentors are ignoring peer reviewed science. A company that makes billions allowing people to gamble to cartoonish levels is stirring the pot to cartoonish levels all regarding a company that regularly causes headlines that read like a cartoon villain.
Article? This is a picture of a fucking tweet…
There isn’t “stock” in the traditional sense, but considering all of these AI companies are running on MASSIVE amounts of debt, to the point the banks can’t loan any more without offloading the risk to outside investors, which they have been doing at an unprecedented scale. So anything that would normally help drive up a stock price would also help the banks sell off the AI companies’ debt allowing them to loan more money to the AI companies.
Someone warned him when he did it, that’s how he knows it is illegal now…
Ah yea it does. Can you repost that, but slower…?
It really seems like way too many people are just kinda going “eh, everyone else is doing it. It’d be impossible for the courts to force us to reverse course on this now.” Like, there’s no way the monkey is going to get the cork back in, might as well just get used to being covered in shit.