Thanks for taking the time to explain. Yeah, without that „Stock Move“ He May had to reduce his possession by selling real shares.

Tbh, even I am not a big fan, I think it’s okay like this. I mean, at least he is paying. And it would kinda be unfair de-thronizing him with sanctions.

Also an interesting thought about this being a maneuver. I personally think he will be removed the day, a different (I mean really different) US-Goverment gets voted. He‘s having a good Cooperation with the corrente one.

What exactly do you mean with being „at risk“? That he could not have paid that?

Even so, I think it is okay. Now he is able to pay the money.

Still, I think you are right. In German we put those articles for some Countries… including USA.

In my understanding he‘s not losing his company. He only will sell the shares that do not include parts of the company

In my opinion they could have pointed out the reason. E. g. talking about car manufacturers & suplliers:

While some politicians are blaming EU-laws for the enormous decreased sales, I personally think it was just dumb relaying on the Chinese market. They learned (and probably stole) manufacturing insights while co-assisting the production (German manufacturers were obliged to produce in joint ventures). And now they just are incentiving their own products.