With all due respect, this is wrong. You were banned for reducing everyone’s contextualizing of China’s decision (that aligns with Hamas and the PA) to “China good,” then attacking everyone in the comments when they tried to explain in more detail. As far as I know, you don’t consider yourself a Marxist-Leninist, but are more of an anti-imperialist.

What’s important is that Hamas requested condemnation and the presentation of an alternative, and the PA requested that it pass. China and Russia complied with both requests. In all messaging from the resistance, there is correct condemnation of the architects and supporters of the plan, not of those who abstained.

China and Russia do not have millitary bases all over the world. They cannot just invade and liberate Palestine, especially when the internationally recognized authority over Palestine, the PA, supports the plan. Resistance groups see the PA as led by compradors, but don’t wish to abolish the PLO but instead reform it. The PLO (as the PA) are kept in resistance talks, and are internationally recognized. Hamas does not claim the same status.

China’s non-intervention is not the same as the actual colonizers going in and trying to carry out their colonial project, and to focus on China when its options are limited instead of the actual perpetrators of colonization is the same logic western liberals use to condemn the resistance for any excess it commits and support Israel. By maximizing the sins of one side and minimizing the sins of the other, you equate what isn’t equal, and are working in service of western narratives that this is something popularly supported and not something condemned by a huge portion of the world.

Ive read plenty of criticisms of China, maybe it was the way you put it or something else.