I have noticed that largely most anarchists online are from the first world and that anarchism is very popular than communism in western countries, i.e. its become overtly a first world white people ideology.
While marxism leninism is popular in the third world, with large marxist leninist parties and non existing anarchist forces. What do you think about this?
Most anarchists are not online, or at least not active online. There’s an inherent defiance in anarchist circles against imperial / extractive technologies like computers, which is less common in leninist circles where cybernetics has been assimilated (eg. under Allende, or in science fiction like Asimov). To be fair, i have met quite a few leninists who were profoundly techno-critical and did not wander on online forums.
So there’s already this biased sample explaining things a little. But “non existing anarchist forces” in the 3rd world is a stretch due to your information bubbles. Can’t say they’re exactly thriving and on the verge of destroying the State, but there’s strong anarchist communities in Sudan, Chile, Syria, Chiapas, Indonesia…
