This is unacceptable. And I’m sick of all the fucking workarounds to maintain basic privacy.

  • Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    We need to collectively abandon tech that insists on any of this. I post about this often, but I’ll say it again: this will come with discomfort; you need to be okay with that temporarily.

    These ghouls cannot withstand weeks / months of boycott. They simply can’t, daddy earning reports and the shareholders won’t allow it.

      • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I was going to give you the benefit of the doubt until I saw your responses.

        “Is AI” is meaningless drivel. Software does not become “AI”, and an OS is not and cannot “be” AI.

        What you mean is, “Debian devs use LLMs to code”, which has no impact on or correlation to whether Debian will include age or ID verification. No one ordered the devs to use LLMs, so that is not evidence of their “compliance” with authorities, as you seem to imply.

        These snarkily-delivered insinuations have no value; they’re not educating anyone about the topic, they’re not arguing anything of substance, they lack basic technical understanding of what they’re criticizing… they’re just a feel-good gotcha for you.

        • eremophila@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          “is ai” is very obviously a simplification, but is also the reality of where they have chosen to go.

          The manner in which debian conducted their transition, says a great deal about them.

          You were not going to give me the benefit of the doubt, don’t expect anyone who is genuine to believe otherwise. The subject of ai is mainly polar. the majority of people on lemmy are not experiencing their 1st day on the internet.

          • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            You were not going to give me the benefit of the doubt, don’t expect anyone who is genuine to believe otherwise.

            You’re free to be as cynical as you like.

            “is ai” is very obviously a simplification, but is also the reality of where they have chosen to go.

            It’s not a “simplification”. A simplification is still roughly the same meaning. “Coded with AI” and “Is AI” are unrelated statements, not more or less nuanced versions of each other, any more than “Bill is driving a racecar” and “Bill is a racecar” are.