

I mean, it’s pretty obvious what happens, right? We die as a country, civilization, and ultimately a species if we can’t find a balance


I mean, it’s pretty obvious what happens, right? We die as a country, civilization, and ultimately a species if we can’t find a balance


… Then there won’t be a lasting positive change?
That’s how if statements work


See, you say that’s apples and apples but it’s a totally different scenario. Apples to apples is changing the robot with a different type of robot that’s doing a job that a human previously would have done. By changing the robot to a human, it’s a different argument because it’s a human and not a robot. A human has different rights than a semiautominous delivery device. So apples to apples would be: instead of a Uber robot, it’s a waymo car.
By changing the robot to a human, the argument falls apart because she’s protesting using robots for jobs humans are capable of doing and traditionally did. If the robot is swapped to a human, she wouldn’t be protesting because that’s what she’s advocating for. It being a human, not a robot.


I wonder if there’s a connection to the Russian bot farm that was destroyed recently


Hashbrowns covered in chili, cheese, and sausage gravy. Aka the waffle House smothered hashbrowns
All I know is that it’s not done until everything’s counted and the dust settles. I’m sure there’ll be plenty of complaints and baseless lawsuits if it doesn’t go one specific way and not sure if that’ll cause delays in certifications