

Mind expanding on the lawsuit part? So, a game gets incorrectly tagged and the maker sues over contacting first?
Edit: I might have to think up ways of making clear that the liability lays on the reporter, not the platform.
Just a dude looking for good conversation
and getting my dick sucked


Mind expanding on the lawsuit part? So, a game gets incorrectly tagged and the maker sues over contacting first?
Edit: I might have to think up ways of making clear that the liability lays on the reporter, not the platform.


They planned local model but they’re bleeding cash atm handing out free inference.


Well, you’ve seen the sister driving game tho?


Your questions were great to bounce against. It led to the introduction of a new edge case: redeemed
It doesn’t erase previous GenAI usage but it shows the author’s effort to go a better way



Yeah, that’s just not enforceable with how much they shove it.


Missed those. Will add. What are the common music gen services? Suno?
For voices I only know eleven labs


How so? The categories of AI disclosure seem fine to me.


For that I’ve got a personal example. I have a professional project made in laravel a PHP framework. I made the choice to use it before the AI craze, I am maintaining the project but I didn’t choose for the tech stack to embrace AI like it did.
The fact that these projects take long to make does bind you to the choices of someone else makes that you can’t control.
But you did nail it in the head, it’s the focus on personal choice that I’m aiming at.


For the nuance, I’m setting up a labeling system for the users to decide for themselves.


The second side of the comment about using libraries that coopt AI code. I think LLM use falls into a personal category. You can’t control that someone down your tech stack used it but you can certainly not use LLMs.
If you find out that your tech stack is tainted but your workflow is human asking for a rewrite is unfeasible. I’d argue that the next project should use human-centric tools but that is something for later down the stack.


Second ps.: There might be a method of redemption for a project to move from tainted to handcrafted but it’d be easily verified. For example, Dave the diver has an LLM usage notice where they did the translations with AI. Should they re-do the translation work with actual translators (or let the community translate the work themselves) there might be a case towards bumping from tainted to hand-crafted.
I’ll be honest, I feel fine tainted being the “standard” and handcrafted being a the selective seal of approval. I’ll think things over. The chance for redemption creates subjective cases that give the people to say “why them but not me”.


It’s a conscious choice. I want to design the index to encourage people working towards the handcrafted stage. Any kind of AI usage immediately putting you on either slop or tainted drives the point home.


Thanks for the questions!
Ps.: I’ve added an extra phrase to the tainted description.


Machine build to steal and plagiarize steals and plagiarizes. Shocked pikachu
Yeah, world’s a bit cruel to ugly people. Nothing you can do but grow some self-confidence.


Oh well, I wish you the best. These are indeed things I don’t know about.


Then I don’t see what’s the issue imo. We have protests, yes but they’re their own thing. Maybe I don’t know enough about eastern EU but here in Spain things are very peaceful.


You can’t leave Russia?


Tho, you’re probably too inundated atm for me to chip in with lustful words. Hope your day goes well!
That’s what happens when you have affairs with grown women. Oligarchs are a pedophile only club