That’s not true. The first exemption from AI on religious grounds was a Unitarian universalist (another secular, values based religious organization), back in June.

https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/religious-exemption-ai-work

While using Dazzle to plot out her 14-year-old son Macallister’s birthday party, the AI tool recommended a glow-in-the-dark theme, including glowing pool toys and phosphorescent corn hole.

“He was like, ‘Mom, I don’t want to hit the theme that hard,'” Mayer said of her son’s reaction. “I just can’t help myself.”

Even her kid is trying to get her to stop with the AI shit

Yes because release price=price people actually buy it at. Also show me a 5060 at $300. The release price used to be the price early adopters had to pay as a premium. Now it’s a discounted price that you can never actually get.

Why am I arguing with you. You’re seriously claiming Graphic card prices didn’t increase. That should have been enough to make me block you and ignore your nonsense.

That price range was for the XX60 and on a good sale the XX70. The fact that $300 gets you an XX50 is a tragedy.

It makes the potato have more calories because it has oil in it.

Same amount of chewing and swallowing. More calories. It’s what you want!

That’s not how shares work at all!

You can’t turn them into the company at market value, you have to sell it to other people to cash out. The only time a company buys its shares is when they do a buyback, but that wouldn’t be a debt on the balance sheet.

The shareholders are just the company owners.

By the fact that I have a death note… This is a hypothetical scenario where the person who answers has a death note. That’s the system. Did you read the thread? You said you wouldn’t use the death note on billionaires and “non acute” threats because we already have systems to deal with it? But there is no actual system because billionaires don’t get imprisoned or punished for their crimes including raping kids at Epstein’s. Sounds really unethical for you not to. I guess you’re one of the “I would never pull the lever” people in the trolley problem.

That doesn’t address the fact that there are no functioning mechanisms to implement justice against those who harm us by hoarding pillaging and staking from us to amass incomprehensibly vast wealth.

We do not. The billionaires pillage and kill with impunity. Cops and ice kill and pillage with impunity. You’re living in a fantasy if you think our system deals with the other cases. Look at the Epstein list.

Have them list their inheritors. Have them say their wealth is cursed and anyone who keeps even a cent will die.

Then write the names of everyone on the list for the next round unless they give up all their wealth.

What kind of mathematically illiterate nonsense is that. You think to be in the global 1% takes MORE MONEY than being in the US 1%???

You understand that requires the global average wealth to be HIGHER than the US right?

Besides the top 1% of the 1% (billionaire class) are a lot more problematic than someone who makes 450k/yr… That’s just a good doctor in the west. Plus Forbes publishes a billionaire list.

Take away the concept of limited liability. Shareholders are responsible for the crimes the company they own commits.

This will create an insurance industry to protect shareholders and they would force companies to demonstrate compliance with regulations to keep premiums low.

If someone in the company committed fraud to deceive the owners then they can try to sue him. He can go to jail too if it’s criminal.

Making it so owners are not responsible for the actions of the company that makes them money is why the system is broken.

Limited liability corporations were initially created for large public projects like bridges where the liability was too high to attract investors, but the public benefit was very large. Where is the public benefit now?

It’s not that they’re not copyrightable. That court case is misunderstood. The vibe coder tried to give the AI the copyright and the judge ruled that was stupid because AI can’t own shit.

Also copyright doesn’t mean much anymore because companies are rewriting open source software as copyrightable vibe coded bullshit the same way people are “open sourcing” Adobe using vibe coded crap.

It’s garbage “progress” all the way down.

Officers were responding to a shoplifting call alleging that Wiley’s mother, Vellesiya Wiley, and Latoya Ferrell had stolen a pack of diapers. The women exited the store with the child as officers arrived, entered their vehicle and began to leave the parking lot. Officers drew their weapons, and Vellesiya Wiley lifted her son up to show the officers that a child was in the car. One officer fired into the vehicle, killing the baby as she held him. A bullet also wounded Ferrell.

She lifted the baby to show the officers that a child was in the car. The officers shot the baby to acknowledge Israel’s right to exist

Yeah, it’s pretty much the worst that we’ve created a homunculus run by the rich that can pass off as human in many contexts.

The second one had the aggression of a human trying to prove a point. The other two had the dispassionate calm writing style of AI trying to convince you without upsetting you.