Yes

The problem is with “fact checking” that all lessons are correct and working as expected.

Right now, of all the lessons/courses generated and available, do you vouch for the accuracy of ALL of them? Do you guarantee that, if someone who knew about the subject matter (like, physics) double checked every available question and answer in that field, they’d reply “Yes, this is all correct”? If the answer is no to either, do you know how many questions and answers are misleading or plain wrong?

Surplus is not profit.

Plenty of slop is making a profit passing off as news sites. There’s also the video slop flooding the big social media sites, earning ad revenue

Since the majority of AI use today is fully profit driven, what would be left if there was no money to be made at all with it

Hammers, along with wheels, fabrics and ceramics, predate the notion of profit by thousands of years

I tried ~20g, 3 nutmegs, one time. Other than the pain of drinking the awful tasting “tea”, I had zero effects. Didn’t try a bigger dose because of the damn taste.

“Yours truly, a 17 year old from India that thought they were doing something good.”

If this is true, I can cut some slack on the person being really, really fucking naive and acting on impulse instead of doing the bare minimum of talking to the actual authors.

“Why did I charge for AI Slop audiobooks? I doubt anyone knows how expensive it is to run a server like this, especially with the amount of usage this site got. It had 126,592 unique users within 24 hours of going up, and had terabytes of bandwidth in usage. In an attempt to keep the site up, I thought audiobooks were a good option. I sold like 11 audiobooks, if it’s any consolation.”

This shows how little this Ganesh thought things through. “It cost so much money!” - nobody affected cares, you acted the same way the abhorrent big tech companies do, slurping content en masse while giving the middle finger to the community responsible for creating and maintaining it.

It’s super ironic that online trust was much higher in dial up times, back when “don’t trust what you find on the internet” was the rule

Giardino suggested that developers can protect their work by first building a strong community around it, and then focusing on continual improvements: “Rather than relying on a single mechanic that someone can easily copy, you need to keep growing your game by adding features, personality, and creativity that stem from your own perspective.”

Not every game needs a fuckload of features. Not everyone has the time and skill to create and manage a community around their own game.

Steam could at least allow people to vote on whether some games are complete clone garbage or not, have the weight of the vote rely on the account level + age. Or let people indicate the original game on a clone’s page. Like any community feature, I can see this being a vector for abuse, but this AI bullshit is absolutely ruining online trust

That’s a very kunnin’ question, Gork will answer it

Sounds just like LG! https://www.notebookcheck.net/LG-smart-TVs-caught-logging-audio-with-screen-off-and-snooping-on-local-devices.1391214.0.html

Really good read. Making the car comparison and all its effects hammers (pun intended) down that “just a tool” can be an incredibly complex thing that needs a lot of variables to work properly. A hammer is a simple tool, a computer is not simple - there’s a global logistics chain that allows their existence - and neither is AI.

We need to fight back against design that flattens our humanity at the benefit of efficiency and productivity. We need to question how our tools have created infrastructures and landscapes that are hostile to human existence.

Emphasis mine. I’ve been thinking about that a lot. Everything is about being more efficient, more productive. Fuck that shit, I wanna enjoy life.

I guess we’re too used to melon musk and trump meltdowns, so anything that isn’t balls to the wall incoherent rambling is deemed like a normal conversation on xitter

Aw come on, being UTTERLY ANNIHILATED isn’t that weak :(

Shit, that was a good one 🤣

They’ve been failing at literally every step in AI coverage, especially at just parroting whatever the fuck anthropic and openai claim to be their newest breakthrough without questioning anything. Failing basic math is just icing on the cake.

Dude, I’m this close to trading my beenz for a million dollars!!!

I suspect this might be worse due to the amount of money being thrown around. As much as I want the companies responsible for the stupid bubble to go bankrupt, there’s a lot of money from pension and investment funds, so that’s going to hurt a lot of people who had nothing to do with that.

https://www.wheresyoured.at/credit-crunch/

It’s like half the thread belongs in one of the power_tripping_bastard/mod_abuse communities