Also das ist für mich noch das größte Problem, hab hier ein paar Sonos (die alten ohne Mikro) und ein paar Alexageräte, aber was richtig gutes von home assistant mit guten Lautsprechern würd ich sofort kaufen.

This is nonsense, just because someone uses the same tool as you do, does not mean that you support it.

Wie machst du das mit Lautsprechern und Mikrofonen?

Warum dann nicht einfach zur Asse dazukippen

It reduces the support for Ukraine. That’s enough of a reason.

Where is the final depleted uranium storage facility in the United States?

Source on horrible storage: https://www.bge.de/de/asse/themenschwerpunkte/das-salzwasser-in-der-asse/

Salt water inside isn’t good. Estimated costs are in the billions and paid by the tax payers and not the company responsible for it.

Source on kWh prices for nuclear?

“Flamanville 3, under construction in 2010, had an initial estimated cost in 2007 of €3.3 billion. By the time the reactor went online in 2024, the final cost had risen to an estimate €13.2 billion”

Hinkey point is currently being built and has a minimum price per kWh of 15 cents. Even the worst priced private solar offer over here will be closer to 10 and a good one with storage at 6. For commercial it’s closer to 3. Including storage at commercial capacity is around 10.

https://www.iwr.de/news/britisches-atomkraftwerk-hinkley-point-c-verzoegert-sich-weiter-und-wird-teurer-atomstrom-kostet-mindestens-15-cent-pro-kilowattstunde-news39541

Source on nuclear getting cheaper to build?

Also, solar and wind plus storage is cheaper, faster online, does not need artificial lakes, nor 1000 year storage that has historically been horrible. Plants also historically didn’t need to update security. It’s literally the worse option. Even with green hydrogen and storage.

Your coal argument is a strawman/whataboutism. I’m saying skip nuclear unless you’re around the artic circle.

Nuclear is a horrible option though. It takes ages to come online (10+ years builds are the norm), is more expensive than solar/wind plus batteries right now, has to basically operate for a minimum of 40 years to turn a profit because of how expensive the build is to begin with and requires a steady output of energy so would only be good as a base load. Also, it requires big power grid infrastructure to deliver gigawatts in power from a single source, so exactly the opposite of most current renewables and even if you’d replace nuclear with a renewable and reused it’s grid, you’d now have to find a place that is good for either.

Then there is the whole environmental stuff like radiation and the point that the whole earth is heading towards 2.8c higher temperatures and the fact that countries like France have to reduce their output of reactors in the summer because of water temperatures in the rivers they use for cooling.

Quite possible, but my bet is that they will buy the winners, just like after dotcom

They don’t pay that much tax to where I am from, so if the US wants to do so, have fun.

Yes, but I don’t see floods of users switching to better privacy options any time soon

I don’t see how Google would willingly get rid of the goodwill and data of normal users like that. Most people don’t know about the sheer site of Googles ad revenue. Also, Google will be the player that shows ads in Google answers, so the moat for ads will become bigger instead of smaller in my mind. Do you have a source on Google ads dying? Last I heard was that it was very profitable for alphabet.

Google and Microsoft are profitable without ai. So I’d assume the bubble popping will not crash them

It doesn’t have to be. On tiktok or wherever else you obey some algorithm, sure. But Lemmy should be a place for open, honest communication. Even those you disagree with, just to make sure you know your biases and can reflect on.

Masking one letter doesn’t change the tone. It just makes it worse to read. Self censorship is stupid. I downvote any content that hides it’s intent, as it negates the use of language and makes it harder for non native speakers to follow and learn proper English.

What good is a lingua franca if you change it from normal to some kind of abomination?

You are allowed to write cunt on the Internet.

And open models regularly have versions released that remove these restrictions. Qwen won’t answer any questions June 1989 in Tianmen square, but the unrestricted version does.

Ich mag die Süßstoffe einfach gar nicht. Dann würde ich glaub ich eher anfangen selbst Cola zu machen…

Hoffentlich kommen die jetzt nicht auf die Idee Zucker mit Süßstoffen zu mischen. Pepsi macht das schon und das Zeug ist ungenießbar. Wenn ich Zuckerplörre trinken will, will ich auch Zucker drin haben. Gefühlt schmeckt das gepanschte noch süßer.

GRR ist gleichzeitig auch die lustigste Kombination als Name.