Rothe

No, that is what the interns are for.

Since the hyperscaler datacentres contribute massively to extra fossil fuel burning, then we are all definitely worse off, regardless of whether it helps some people write sloppy code really fast.

Yeah, it would be nice to have some accurate figures about how many AI datacenters currently exist (preferably worldwide by country) and how many are on the drawing board (most of which will never be build thankfully).

But I guess the inaccurate information is all part of the deliberate obfuscation from the hyperscalers.

Used to be true, now he definitely is a multibillionaire after these last 2 years of completely blatant grifting and corruption.

Putin said so.

Also that is what Putin is paying them to do.

I really hope the US AI bubble crashes and burns before Europe and Canada gets to waste too much money on competing with their corrupt slop scam.

He, like all the other techbro CEOs, have cut out the need for consumers on account of the AI circlejerk funding scheme. So they don’t have to lie and pretend they care about people anymore to appease the stock market, now they just have to compete in spewing psychopathic nonsense to attract other billionaire investors for their company.

And unsurprisingly they are all very adept at spewing psychopathic nonsense, it just comes perfectly natural to them for some mysterious reason.

What? You think that statement was a negative towards Ukraine?

We have eyes and the capability of reading. It very obviously was that.

It is a stupid argument even if made in good faith.

AI sucks but I think it’s unfair to assume everyone feels comfortable, capable or self assured enough to write something of their own.

That is such a stupid argument to make. It is not really so much what you write but the thought behind it. And the thought behind using AI is always signalling something negative. Not writing anything but your name would be more personal and heartfelt than that.

February 2025 is antiquated numbers. The amount of fascist radicalisation which has been happening this 1½ years since then has been considerable.

No, you are not hallucinating, he did say that.

The hundreds of millions of tax payer money paid in compensation to the those pieces of shit mink farmers after the COVID closures, just because the government made a completely preventable legal error before acting is the real fiasco of this whole affair.

I don’t know why you don’t already know this, but fascists and xenophobes are capable of voting as well.

It was invented by Lovecraft. The authors cashing in on it by writing versions of it are all from long after he had died.

The AI calamity that will kill off humanity (or at least our current way of life) is the massively increased output of greenhouse gases on account of the huge AI datacenter power usage, mostly fueled by fossil fuel generators.

This will speed up climate change and the mass extinction event already occuring. For lots of living species on this planet it is already too late. And instead of doing everything in our power to counter that, we are actively piling on top of the causes for it. All for nothing but greed.

It is very naive to think there is no collusion going on though. We already have plenty of proof that Putin funds Afd and similar right wing parties in Europe.

He is not controlling all that they do, but he is funding them and and telling them what to think about certain issues. This take on Ukraine being a common talking point among all right wing parties across Europe (and the world) is not a coincidence.

Since you begun the extremism by calling another commenter insane for their views, I will say it is an interesting view coming from somebody who is obviously hopelessly lost in the smell of their own farts.

Why does our ability to create a civilisation (which largely has only been to the benefit of our species compared to all others) makes the value of a human individual worth more compared to other living beings?

Your own explanation is hopelessly confused, since you are obviously trying to argue your self-admitted subjective opinion as objective fact.