I’d guess that it is an exact replica of a different coin. If you look for pictures of Athenian owl tetradrachms (the ancient coin is a tetradrachm, but different times and places within the ancient Greek world had different designs) then you’ll see that there are lots of little variations. I haven’t found one that matches the euro design exactly, but you’ll get the idea
The North Coast 500 (the one in Scotland) is due to a pass called the Bealach na Bà. There’s a big sign warning about the danger of taking large vehicles along it, but it’s not strictly banned or impossible, and as such people absolutely do take caravans on it. They really shouldn’t, but they do
He was consistently friendly to all three while in power, I can’t say I’m that surprised unfortunately
However, any secretary general candidate can be vetoed by any of the five permanent members. I really can’t see France allowing him
According to the site’s FAQ and about pages, the articles are AI output
The Gripen has already had one engine replacement as well, the Gripen E has a different one from prior versions. That’s actually part of the problem - the old one was an American design built on licence in Sweden, but the new one is just American
Edit: I’m stupid, didn’t realise that the video actually mentions this specifically. Although I think that comparing the afterburning thrust is a bit off without also mentioning that the non-afterburning thrust, the one used most of the time, is actually higher for the Eurojet
While I do not mean to imply that military fighter jet engines can just be trivially hotswapped, I wonder if the Eurofighter’s engine could be adapted as a replacement? The Eurofighter itself has two because it’s a much larger aircraft, but the individual engines are actually pretty close in dimensions, weight, and performance
It has a active protection system which can handle incoming missiles, that will be a solid defence against drones too. Russia has developed an APS which they’ve used successfully in the invasion, but they only had it ready a few months before their full-scale invasion started, so it’s only on newly-built or fully-refurbished tanks. It also has the drawback that it was initially designed to deal with missiles; Ukraine figured out that it could eventually be overwhelmed by just sending enough drones at it to drain its relatively limited ammo, something that would be impractical with expensive missiles, but until then it apparently handles incoming drones pretty effectively. The Challenger’s one has the benefits of being designed with the knowledge of what drone warfare looks like
It’s also worth noting that nobody publishes videos of drone attacks failing. A cheap little quadcopter with a grenade strapped to it is, ultimately, jut a way to throw a grenade unusually far. A tank like this can shrug off a grenade. Attacking them requires bigger, heavier, more expensive drones carrying bigger, heavier, more expensive munitions. Or you use the drone to sight artillery. But the point remains that even in the age of drone warfare, tanks are still harder to kill. There’s a reason both sides are still using them
I would think so too, but I don’t think this image is actually from the mint. At least, I can’t find it on the Bank of Greece’s website. Their euro banknotes & coins page actually doesn’t show the national side of the coins at all, only the common side