Y u no Mamaleek

  • 0 Posts
  • 47 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: November 3rd, 2025

help-circle

  • the phone companies would be able to charge peak megabyte hours to specific websites

    ISPs in the US were aiming to do that, since video traffic dominates the web pretty heavily now. But that could be easily abused, so they were slapped away with the net neutrality regulations, which iirc Trump rolled back.

    I just don’t believe it applies in this specific domain any longer.

    You referred to the megabytes thing in the past tense, yes, but the reasoning applied back then. In fact, gigabit speeds are still not prevalent worldwide (nor just in the US, from what I understand about their shitty ISPs). I can easily saturate the 100 mbps allotted to my cable-connection plan in the neighbourhood that doesn’t provide much choice, and I’m pretty sure mobile connection isn’t better than that in most cases.




  • like when cellphone companies tried to claim megabytes were a precious finite resource

    Limiting the usage of a shared channel is a valid approach, it’s remarkable how so many people just absolutely refuse to understand this. You can use the entire bandwidth of the shared channel for a while, when your webpage is loading. If you use the entire bandwidth nonstop, you fuck over everyone else on the channel. So the company has the choice between giving you fast load times but limiting your usage otherwise, or giving you 32 kbps unfettered.

    If you want an entire channel of guaranteed bandwidth with unlimited usage, you always could and can get it — under business plans, which are orders of magnitude costlier, because they don’t share the channels.

    In a similar fashion, if your healthcare system is entirely free, it’s getting clogged with retired old people who are lonely and have nothing better to do. If a doctor visit costs even a couple bucks (depending on the region), the doctors are suddenly much more free to deal with real cases.









  • By that time ‘Dracula’ was already plagiarized as ‘Nosferatu’ in 1922, since F.W. Murnau wasn’t given the rights to adapt ‘Dracula’, so he shrugged his shoulders, changed a few things and made his own film. Inventing some stuff on the way like Nosferatu being affected by sunlight, about which Dracula and folklore vampires never gave a shit.

    The 1931 ‘Dracula’ is notable partly due to its set having been used at nights to make a Spanish-language version in parallel. Which is considered better than the English-language one, because its crew had access to the English dailies and could check what worked and what didn’t.