Heaven forbid that women reclaim a sexist insult.

I have a coworker who brags a lot about how much he drinks and how little he sleeps. Unsurprisingly, he’s one of the worst at his job.

The wildest part was learning he was 6 years younger than me. I would have guessed he was 10 years older from how bad he looks.

They aren’t encrypting the messages with the signing keys.

Do you even know how a signing key work?

It’s more leftist than Reddit, but just as insufferable.

I guess nowhere is safe from the hivemind.

Fwiw, Lemmy users upvote the shit out of AI memes every day, and only a handful of scolds complain about it.

Oh no! Not our beloved corporate-owned proprietary intellectual property! Won’t somebody think of the sacred copyright system, bestowed upon us by God? /s

Sorry, but it sounds like you’re saying that AI is a threat to tech Capitalism, and that this is a bad thing somehow.

This is misinformation. It has been confirmed that there were zero fatalities on the ground. There are photographs that show that the white car closest to the crash remained intact, with only minor damage (all the tires were flat).

There’s no real issue with AI-generated memes. Memes have always been low-effort. Artists aren’t getting displaced by this specific use of GenAI. I find the #neverslop spam in the comments of every AI meme to be a bigger annoyance than low-effort genAI images.

That, and people here love to use sexist and ableist language while also claiming to be progressive. Sorry, but nobody who deliberately uses slurs is a progressive. You’re just a bigoted asshole who supports universal healthcare.

I’m really tired of the lie that ArtCraft is “reverse engineered Photoshop”.

It’s a slop factory. If you don’t believe me, download it and run it yourself. It’s just a frontend for tons of image and video GenAI bullshit. It doesn’t resemble Photoshop in the slightest, that narrative is pure marketing.

And it’s only “free” in the sense that you can download it for free. The first thing they ask you to do when you launch the program is buy tokens from them.

Yeah, but I run local AI models and don’t want the experience to suck ass.

I think it’s more of a criticism of you arguing that Anthropic cares about indie game developers.

Unfortunately true. Burritos also contain no donkey meat, despite the name.

You’re telling that my ribbed condoms don’t contain any rib meat?

Next you’ll tell me that a McMansion isn’t a real mansion!

Not really. Ever notice how every demographic poll asks you what race you are, then asks again if you are Hispanic?

That’s because a large number of Hispanics identify as white, and you have to ask twice if you actually want to know how many Hispanics answered your poll.

Unsurprisingly, many are white supremacists, and actual white people will exploit that when convenient.

I’m not asking you to support Pike. I’m asking you to condemn torture and demand accountability from the government.

It’s important to know who your enemies are. Not caring about government -inflicted suffering is worth noting. I would never trust someone like you IRL.

So you admit she was tortured, but don’t think she deserves any amount of restitution for having her constitutional rights violated. There’s only one way to read this: you don’t care if her constitutional rights were violated, and are happy to use her crimes as justification for it.

She already waived somebody else’s rights completely away.

This is the exact same argument the Trump admin has used to deny immigrants due process before deportation. You talk like a fucking fascist.

That’s great and all, but the reality is that she was neither jailed for life or executed, she was tortured, and she deserves restitution because, despite her conviction, she still has constitutional rights.

You keep trying to handwave her rights away with appeals to disgust. I don’t give a shit about whatever emotional reaction details of the original crime brings you. If you don’t respect the constitutional protection against torture, you’re deeply in the wrong.

Pike may have perpetrated a crime, but she is also a victim of state abuse. The former doesn’t invalidate the latter.

Well, I don’t like it when people sanewash billionaire greed, and you defended his logic around “utilization” as if it were a good point.

This doesn’t matter. You are just too emotionally fixated on the details of the crime to have a good faith conversation about the constitutional implications of state sanctioned torture.

Torture is explicitly forbidden by the Constitution. You cannot use it to punish some, and if you do, that person deserves restitution, prior crimes notwithstanding.

You said “cheaper executions”. That only means one thing: Expediting the timeline and getting rid of appeals.

I understand that you didn’t say that explicitly, but I didn’t put words in your mouth. You called for expediting the timeline and getting rid of appeals by saying “cheaper executions”, because that’s how you cut costs on executions.