I don’t expect my votes to be private, but I will vote as if they were. People reading too much into why someone might have voted a certain way and trying to shame them for it is embarrassing, I’m not going to constrain myself to reasons for voting that are immediately legible to anyone via only one bit of information just for their sake. If I want to downvote something with, for instance, a political message I agree with but the person phrased it in a way that goes against my pet peeves, I’m gonna do that, and I think the ideal would be for these numbers not to be taken very personally or seriously.

So basically I’d say it’s bad taste to put it in a UI, but only so far as it encourages people to be weird about it, and ultimately that’s on them.

Nitter has been shut down, but there are still working instances for now

What have people found the best compaction scheme/harness to be for relatively short context? I’ve been trying to set up an agentic workflow and context management seems like the biggest source of jank and errors. Reassuring to see a paper like this though since the amount of context I can use and still have everything in vram is not that high.

One thing a lot of people don’t realize at first: You likely have the option to disable visibility of downvotes and/or upvotes in the settings

Probably

Battery powered construction stapler.

Customer-service tools, technical or research systems, and certain internal corporate uses are exempt under Senate Bill S9051B.

Does technical systems mean API based inference providers are off the hook or not? Otherwise I guess it’s time to break out the jailbreak prompts for the Chipotle chatbot.

I sympathize with people who like niche internet communities, but the main thing I want to see happen is the collapse and replacement of centralized social media sites, especially reddit, so the more people the better.

Whether something qualifies as censorship isn’t about whether a legal obligation exists to not censor.

Censorship:

Censorship, the suppression of words, images, or ideas that are “offensive,” happens whenever some people succeed in imposing their personal political or moral values on others. Censorship can be carried out by the government as well as private pressure groups.

You probably understand how publishing newspaper cost money and why the owner/editor decides what goes in and what doesn’t.

Are you familiar with how billionaires have been buying up and imposing their will on journalism on a massive scale?

Even if it was a scarce resource that’s important to use efficiently, p2p inference sharing/markets are a thing, local hardware ownership doesn’t have to mean it all sits idle.

Isn’t that just a mod manager? So you want a mod manager that supports the games you work on?

NEDM

Yeah but until recently that tracked the decreasing cost of storage, so you might think devs would be prioritizing lower filesizes now

1 good thing coming of it, doesn’t wipe away all the fucking harm AI is causing. If AI never blew up, the world would be better off. It’s introduced a whole host of problems we didnt need

So what though? You don’t have the option of getting rid of it, and it’s a technology, not a person. Nuance is called for, especially if the alternative is refusing to acknowledge good things people do with it, or focusing condemnation on “AI” as a monolithic entity instead of the particular people and companies doing harm with it. Case in point, OpenAI banning this person.

You don’t need to blame math or people who make use of it for the abuses of billionaires and corporations.

I think the point is people like the person hacking Samsung smart TVs with AI should get some credit, purist “AI bad” takes don’t account for this. Also if there’s regulation it’s likely to start by targeting good uses like that one. Fuck OpenAI though.

The idea that the people wrecking the world are playing 5d chess and only pretending to be delusional idiots becomes less believable by the day. Things may get worse, but their plans are going to blow up in their faces, because they don’t contend with reality and that makes for bad plans.

A big part of the premise EA people seem to be working with is that earning a lot of money is itself beneficial or at least morally neutral, so what makes the most sense is to spend your time and energy earning as much money as possible so you can spend that money to enable and compel other people to do charity work, the good of which will supposedly outweigh anything you can do yourself directly.

Personally I see this as a catastrophic underestimation of how evil capitalism is. Anything you do to contribute to the economy is harmful, and you can’t make up for that with more structuring other people’s lives in employment arrangements. The best thing you can do morally with respect to money is to both earn and spend as little of it as possible. Other people’s actions do not count as your own just because you paid for them, if you want to do good you have to do it yourself. What the world needs the most is de-financialization of our lives, and doing the most good should involve contributing to that with your own life and also helping others move away from being ruled by money.

Pretty much only Lemmy. I use it because I believe centralized social media and the companies that run it are killing the internet, and want to put energy into something that might replace it instead of creating free content for Reddit as I did for years.

Yeah idk why I have this impression, I saw it like 30 years ago and don’t remember too many details