

Yeah, it makes no difference, the system is rigged, you have to go after the real beneficiaries.


Yeah, it makes no difference, the system is rigged, you have to go after the real beneficiaries.


Any punishment to the company will be paid by it’s customers anyway… For any large company fines and legal fees are calculated in as a cost of doing business. Prison for execs will just lead to fall guys getting the job while the real beneficiaries i.e. major stakeholders will pull the string from the shadows. If you want this to stop you have to go after them. Something like community service or % of their stock holdings going to the victims would be more effective imo.
Edit: You may not like what i’m saying but deep down you know i’m right.


Breaking company’s policy still isn’t a crime. Just sayin’.


Nobody publicly known other than some insider traders. It seems like an excuse to explain/cause the stock value drop that started well before this came to light. Pretty standard practice to rekt over-leveraged longs and then slurp up the dip. Fundamentally nothing changed, the world still needs GPUs.


Nice, buy the dip.


Etherum settles in 12 seconds and can handle >30k transactions per second across it’s layer 2s, by 2030 it aims to be capable of 10k tps on the main chain alone and enable protocol native shielded pools for private transactions.
Monero is already private and one of the most stable cryptos out there. It takes ~1 min for a single conf, but because there is no replace by fee feature, you can accept 0 conf tx for small payments.
Compared to fiat big cryptos like ₿, Ɱ, ETH tend to appreciate in value, so even if you were using them for payments without looking at the price, over a longer period, for most people the average they paid would be lower than if they used fiat, which only ever goes down in value.


Because helping Pac-Man eat dots at least takes some effort and impose scarcity, and that’s already better than working for money another man can print for free.


How many people buy houses as an investment instead of living in them, how many people buy oil as an investment instead of using it for fuel, how many people buy gold and silver as an investmen instead of using them for jewelry or industrial applications, how many people buy dram as an investment instead of putting it in their computers… I guess it’s all a scam then? What a dumbass take. Besides, store of value is one of the intended purposes of a crypto currency, I don’t see how you can hold against it the fact that more people are opening their eyes to how valuable this property of crypto really is in the face of their life saving being vaporized by the money printer.
M2 - money supply, USD

Bitcoin supply

Monero supply



Because there is no centralized entity whom you can ask to do that, that’s the whole point. Only the change to the community controlled consensus - (most of miners, node runner, validators and users agreeing to it) can achieve that, but there is no interest in that as it would undermine one of the main principals of crypto currency and it’s cash like properties - transaction irreversibly.


Most bockchains have a pretty good security, some guy you gave all your money to because he pinky promised to keep it safe not so much.


If you’re behind cgnat opening ports on your router won’t do you any good. You have to call your isp and ask them for a dedicated public ip, usually for a price if they offer one at all. If that ip is static you can remember it, if not, you need ddns. If you’re one of the lucky few not behind cgnat then yeah, your setup will be the simplest possible, but if you are, like the majority of people these days, it’s one of the most complicated.


Depends what you mean by setting up ssh. Installing sshd, sure. Opening up ports, calling your isp to buy dedicated ip if they even offer one, getting a domain, setting up ddns…


That’s not always an option and when it is, setting it up is often more complicated and less secure than using a relay server. Honestly, the fastest (to setup), easiest and most secure option would be ssh server as a tor hidden service. Everything is handled by tor out of the box, .onion domain name, nat hole punching, E2EE, port scanning bots… all taken care of, no need for opening ports, static ip, dns, ddns, fail2ban, worrying that there’s a 0 day or that you misconfigured something. No one can exploit you service if nobody knows it exists.


If you can rent a vps you can use it as a relay server. You setup sshd on your home pc and ssh to the vps with the -R flag.
ssh -R 8022:localhost:22 user@relay
As long as the connection is live you can ssh to the server via relay. If you set GatewayPorts to yes on the relay in sshd_config then it will act as an open port on your home pc and anyone will be able to connect to it over the internet with
ssh -p 8022 user@relay
so make sure to secure it correctly, only allow ssh keys etc. If you set GatewayPorts to no, then only clients connected to the relay will be able to connect to the server, this is a must have if you’re gonna use unsecure protocols like VNC. First ssh to the server
ssh user@relay
next
ssh user@localhost -p 8022
or one line, especially useful when combined with -i to point at the home pc’s ssh key stored on the client
ssh -J user@relay user@localhost -p 8022
You can also setup VNC over ssh. Add 2nd -R on home pc with vnc ports
ssh -R 5901:localhost:5901 user@relay
or together
ssh -R 8022:localhost:22 -R 5901:localhost:5901 user@relay
On the client ssh with the -L flag
ssh -L 5091:localhost:5091 user@relay
Now you can connect your VNC client to
localhost:1
In theory sure, but in practice there are ways a company can offload this burden onto the consumers with minimal impact to their bottom line, like raising prices in an area where there isn’t any competition. Hurting the competitiveness of a major player will likely negatively impact the whole market because it will allow their competition to charge more as well. Most likely it won’t impact large shareholders whose portfolio is diversified enough, as they can own stake in all players on the market simultaneously, it might even be good for them; less competitive market -> higher margins, shareholders with equal stake in T-Mobile, Verizon, AT&T win regardless of any one company’s performance.