🌐
The probability that the ad men or women, involved in the decision making for this image, considered the sexuality of the image is 99%. Was it the focus? No. It is a shot of a woman in the waves looking at how impressive her beach broach is .
Don’t worry! Its STILL okay to reverse engineer the work of photographers artists writers actors voice over musicians modelers animators academics etc etc (feel free to add. the exploitation is literally everywhere!)
Similar to recent Oregon story where school children had their pretzels coated with oven cleaner instead of salt.
One would have to assume all material from this ‘contributor’ was ai gen.
I’d wager like with any paint, even with a perfect application, it would scuff and peel easily. Thus becoming unattractive while ruining your previously more attractive shoes?
Columbia and Charleston must have done some heavy lifting in SC.
To make AI morally good, turn over the tech to the public from which its training data was stolen. Dissolve companies, imprison the heads who orchestrated the theft. That would be a start.
server may be down.
archived link: https://archive.ph/gvPFC
try here: https://archive.ph/gvPFC
ishmahlikaifalashuplachickolamashishkur