Important thing to note, though, and why I don’t block individuals anymore (instead I tag them):

Blocking a user doesn’t prevent them from interacting or replying to your posts. It just hides everything they post or comment from you, as well as any replies afterward. It’s a reverse shadow ban, because it makes it so you are the only person who can’t see what they post.

I personally recommend just tagging them in red and feeling smug in your ability to ignore what they have to say.

In case you weren’t being sarcastic: Yes, that’s a direct quote from the Paedophile traitor, the Fuhrer in Orange, shitlord of Hamberder.

He claimed that the only reason america had COVID cases to report was because we were testing for them, stating directly that testing was bad for publicity.

I’d sooner bring the constellation down, so that it isn’t a fucking Kessler syndrome waiting to happen, perpetually destroying earth-based astronomy as well.

Oh no, what have you done with the twelfth gandalf?!

I am genuinely interested in your take on how you believe the Peano Axioms could be shown to be false in this universe. They seem pretty darn universal, and have nothing to do with the number of fingers on your hand, or even how many dimensions you perceive.

My god, I commented almost this exact thing, word for word.

Since it seems like you’re confused about the precise deformation of earth: the earth is wider around the equator. It’s not being squished but, rather, being flung apart by its spinning on its axis, like spinning pizza dough. Gravity just keeps it the same shape.

If you’re interested, look up “geodesy”

Love me some uncle john’s! Those page numbers are iconic, though I could immediately tell it was UJBR from the asterisks and writing style. Is this from “plunges into history”?

That answers my question, thanks! I was trying to figure out if that incontrovertibility was actually the mitigating factor, since he’s personally responsible for crimes against humanity and war crimes against hundreds and hundreds of innocents, all of which his own statements effectively admit, and is also clearly guilty of treason, which is one of the few crimes that is regularly punished with death, so I figured that would neatly delineate it, and it did. I guess, then, that it’s not because crimes can’t be fully proven that you oppose the death penalty.

Not necessarily in favour of the death penalty, but would you say that the crimes of Donald Trump qualify as having been “established in an irrefutable manner”? I certainly would, and his irrefutably proven crimes include treason, admitted rape, financial crimes in the billions of dollars, suborning genocide, and a myriad of direct war crimes. Are these sufficient to convince you that some place like the ICC in the Hague should have the death penalty as an option, since so many of the war crimes and crimes against humanity are irrefutably proven? For instance, should Benjamin Netanyahu face the death penalty, should he ever be brought to the Hague? Just genuinely curious about the implications of your take.