I think “fled” is the wrong word here. “Fled” means “running from” which implies some sort of conscious decision making usually reserved for living things. If you throw a rock and it bounces off Sam Altman’s head, you don’t say the rock fled from Sam. You just say “Nice shot”
If a driver hits someone without realizing it and drives off to continue their day, that’s still legally fleeing the scene
Maybe, but that’s still based on a human that should be aware of what they’re doing, even if they weren’t at the time.
To me it’s more like a rolling truck running someone over and continuing on down the street. Whoever was in charge of the truck should be liable for not securing it, but the truck at no point fled the scene… it has no awareness or capability to understand.
sometimes there are remote workers (…Another Indian) who drive these things.
That’s wild to think we’ve managed to outsource the very act of driving to another country. Nothing drives innovation quite like capitalism 🫠
It’s a mix. They’re like a Sim in The Sims, humans give them instructions and then they run path finding trying to implement it. The humans can take full control if the robots gets completely confused.
Lmao
Right but if we say “fled” we can get everyone all riled up and increase our engagement metrics.
As the spokesperson put it, the robot’s actions may legally constitute fleeing the scene of a traffic incident, meaning Starship Technologies could very well be on the hook for the incident.
Good. Nail them to the wall.
It’s funny how everyone is getting riled up about this story. You’re only hearing about it because it’s unusual. Over 100 people die on the road every day in America, die at the hands of human drivers, not bots.
Flip it around. Wouldn’t this seem an odd story if a pedestrian or driver caused this accident? No one would care.
How any cars are there one the road everyday? And how many of these “robots”? Put it in perspective.
