• ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Meaningful NATO membership would mean NATO troops stationed in Ukraine (otherwise the mutual defense agreement becomes non-credible) and Russia would not agree to that, so this proposal is funny in that it is unacceptable to both sides.

  • SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Ukraine gave up their nukes so that NATO membership was deemed unnecessary and we saw how that turned out. Asking more of them is criminal.

  • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    “Surely, Hitler will stop at just the Sudetenland.”

    We’ve seen this story before. Appeasement is never the right answer. And that sucks, because the free world is probably being dragged into another world war. But better to draw the line early than let another dictator run rampant for years before taking action.

  • misk@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    NATO membership has to be ratified by all members, often through parliamentary approval. This isn’t something that everyone will agree on so it’s not something that can be given away by Trump.

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      not something that can be given away by Trump.

      Trump got the tariffs. Trump would be gone if the US had lost their soft power.