• SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    12 days ago

    The police don’t need a computer to suspect you. They already suspect you.

    They need a computer to blame the mistake on.

    They used to blame the Drug Dog but this is better.

    • frunch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      12 days ago

      Exactly what AI is really here for–a supposedly all-knowing machine to lay the blame upon for every mistake or misstep or even unlawful/illegal action taken by authorities. It’s an infinite-plausible-deniability machine.

      “Whoops! Looks like our computer mistook you for a criminal! No worries, we’ll eventually let you go after having thoroughly terrorized you and threatened your life. Just be more careful next time…”

  • lmdnw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    12 days ago

    Constitutional rights be damned to a state that will kill to maintain its ability to violate them

  • uen3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    12 days ago

    Hmmm what about making suspicious facial expressions in view of the mandatory driver-facing camera?

  • zurohki@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    $5 says it eventually turns out the AI, trained on historical police behaviour, flags cars as suspicious more often if the driver’s black.

    You don’t have to tell it anything about the driver, it’ll guess based on the car’s location, make, model, colour and age. AI is really great at spotting patterns, even when you try to stop it.