• Taldan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Why is that article trying to hand waive corruption?

    It does have one thing going for it: customers dumb enough to pay top dollar for slightly faster access to the president’s posts

    The president’s posts move markets. Advance access to that information is worth a lot of money. Selling access is corruption. This article wants to convince us it isn’t

  • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Truth Social isn’t a social network anymore. It’s a Bloomberg terminal with a presidential panic button. Wall Street pays up to $100,000 a month to hear Trump before everyone else, while crypto holdings do the heavy lifting on the balance sheet. Turns out the most valuable speech on the »free speech« platform is the kind sold to the highest bidder.

  • Maeve@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    $60,000 and $100,000 per month

    🫪

    A fool and their money are soon parted.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The only fools are the ones not realizing the value of that access

      They’re making a whole lot of money trading with that information. It’s blatant corruption and ignorant people are going around calling them “dumb” and “morons” making millions

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, finance bros gonna finance bro, like it or not, the US presidents words directly effects markets, and any advantage in getting the words will pay off significantly, especially with the potus being as volatile as Trump is.

      As he keeps shifting his public opinions, on random whims traders can really play the shortgame and win with the quicker access to his latest feverdream

      • aetheplace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Which is why preferential access to presidential communications is straight up unconstitutional and a violation of the first amendment (equal access to public announcements).

        Of course trading firms are going to look for any edge they can. It’ll still be an advantage until (or if) it gets struck down by the courts.

        • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Trump needs to be in jail for like a million things at this point, but these companies should be on the hook for insider trading or something. Pretty sure if a politician came up to you and offered you early info for a price and you made stock trades based on that you’d be held responsible. They need a fine so big it bankrupts them and no other company dreams of doing that again, even if offered.

        • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Let’s be honest, his court will never strike this down. Blatantly illegal, just like all the things in this clown show.