• Helix 🧬@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        “Tremendous observation! You were right to try to be better as a father with the help of AI. You did nothing wrong.”

        Probably.

        • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Having to use AI daily I’m curious if I’m rare in this respect.

          Do other people also hate the fact that the responses are modelled in a way that are basically sucking you off?

          Then when you challenge a response (they lie so goddamn much) they suck you off even more.

          • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I’m stuck using Copilot for work, and for 3-4 months I began every prompt with ‘Do not comment or offer an opinion on my query’ and eventually Copilot stopped with the sycophancy.

            Now I’m actively working on deprogramming myself of the notion of speaking to it as a human and making a point to treat it like an old-school MS-DOS ish OS and give it commands instead of being conversational, because it’s important to remember that this fucking thing is a computer program.

          • aspirate2959@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Absolutely. I must use Claude at work. I put instructions in my CLAUDE.MD to, “lay off the sycophantic bullshit. No praise or extraneous details, just deliver answers.”

            It doesn’t work, per se… But it seems to reduce the attempted fellatio, at least a little.

            • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Yeah I might have to try that.

              As an aside having used all flavours from a coding perspective Claude is just chef’s kiss.

              Copilot can burn in a fire.

      • GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        "Your wife left you because you refused to be an active participant in your shared relationship and delegated your parental responsibilities to a glorified plagiarism machine. You’re not just a useless partner — you’re worthless as a father at best and actively harmful at worst. "

        “No, I don’t think that’s right. I’ve convinced myself that AI is the coolest, most useful thing in the world that can only make things better.”

        “You’re absolutely right! I made the mistake of considering your wife’s perspective when your opinion is the only one that matters. As an AI bro, you know better than anyone — the universe revolves around you!”

  • AmyAye@nord.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Parenting hits different when you work in AI

    Yeah, hits like mental abuse.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I knew people were gonna be obsessed with AI, but I genuinely never thought people would surrender all executive function and thought to what is, ultimately, a very elaborate and planet destroying if=then machine.

      the amount of people I have seen becoming totally dependent on it is ridiculous. There are people who cant even have human interaction anymore without running it through their AI model to process the message, and produce a reply.

      and its 100% invading the real world too, I dont know the whole details cause you try to turn your ears off at the pharmacy to not hear other peoples private information… but there was a woman getting very heated with one of the pharmacy people and I only took notice when she slammed her phone on the counter, aggressively pointed at it, and said very loudly “I DON’T CARE WHAT YOU SAY, LOOK, RIGHT HERE, MY AI SAYS YOU’RE WRONG” in a that kareny way that says her and her AI was 100% wrong.

      • LePoisson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Damn I try to keep my mouth shut but if someone screamed that near me I’d be interjecting. Like goddamnit the AI does not know anything.

        It’s a machine modeling human speech. It’s all a hallucination and sometimes that hallucination is straight up lies and sometimes, hopefully most of the time, it aligns with actual reality.

        I fucking loathe that people won’t take 15 minutes to just read a basic primer on what an LLM is. It’s a fancy autocorrect, and yeah it’s way more complex than that but at the end of a day it’s made to model realistic human language output - and that’s it. It doesn’t have any actual knowledge, it doesn’t have any way to know if what it says is true or not, and it certainly doesn’t know if what it says is insane.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think I fall a bit between the people who use it for everything and your opinion of it.

          I get that it’s basically just a prediction engine but thinking of it like that is unhelpful in my opinion. I’ve seen AI rewrite entire code bases overnight that would have taken a team of humans over a year. It’s obviously useful technology it’s just people have this tendency to overuse it.

          It’s kind of like how in the early 2000s they were putting Bluetooth in everything. Eventually we’ll work out what it’s useful for and only use it to that we just have to wait for the frenzy to die down.

          • LePoisson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’ve seen AI rewrite entire code bases overnight that would have taken a team of humans over a year.

            And was the code better, cleaner and more readable? Moreover did it actually still do what it was supposed to and not introduce further unknowns?

            I get that it’s basically just a prediction engine but thinking of it like that is unhelpful in my opinion.

            Unhelpful in the sense that it is what it actually is or unhelpful in the sense that it makes you question the fake narrative we’re getting shoveled to us by tech bros and traditional mass media?

            Like that’s just what it is. All I want is folks to be honest about the limitations of this tech and what is underpinning it. It’s still very impressive but at the end of the day there will always be an inherent problem with LLM in that they are non deterministic - you can give the same AI the exact same prompt 10 times and you’ll get 10 different replies.

            There is no way to get around that. You can’t have a perfectly predictable output and even 1% of the time error is not good enough for widespread adoption when a mistake could mean someone dies or is horribly injured or loses a ton of money etc etc

            • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              And was the code better, cleaner and more readable?

              I’m going to interject here. I’ve got family who does software development professionally, and has leaned heavily into AI to assist with coding, and the answer is ‘yes’, but there are some caveats. If you just tell an AI what to do and let it run hog-wild, you end up with shit. When you have an experienced programmer review and have the AI make targeted changes, it is extremely effective. Some of his projects are seeing 1000% improvements on resource usage and/or compute time.

              Here is the rub though. You’re not going to end up with experienced programmer to manage programming AI agents if they never get any actual experience programming because they’ve just been having an AI do all the coding for them.

            • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              It’s simply better than a human could have produced in the same time. If it works who cares how clean it is like this is what I don’t get about programmers they’re so obsessed with cleanness and it doesn’t matter it’s so unimportant to the end goal yeah I get that maintenance of the program would be a pain but the AI is going to do that so who cares.

              I do sort of feel that this community is so obsessed with hating AI that they don’t give it the benefit of the doubt when it actually achieve things.

              The problem with AI is not the product itself it’s the way that people use it like let’s not lose sight to that, that’s not give all the tech Bros ammunition by trying to claim that everything AI does is terrible and bad and awful simply because it was the AI that did it.

  • Denjin@feddit.ukdeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m so glad AI is here to relieve me of the physically and mentally overwhelming task of checks notes spending time with my child.

  • the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    That poor kid, Imagine your own father thinks so little of you that he would rather spend 10X the time to train a clanker just so he doesn’t have to spend time with you.

    I’m guessing some day he will be one of those oblivious assholes on facebook whining because his kids cut off contact.

  • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Brought to you by the creators of, “just give them an ipad” and “call the cops there’s a kid outside playing”

  • damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I have a few friends who use OpenAI and Gemini to do this (generate new stories every night) and I do not understand why you would do so. There are a bazillion kids books out there. Just get ten of those and your kid will be happy for ten months!

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t believe that man has ever touched a fellow human enough to marry, let alone procreate

  • jpreston1986@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Just finished reading Neal Stephenson’s “Diamond Age,” which is kind of a sequel to “Snow Crash,” (both are great books, I recommend them).

    In it, there’s a sophisticated kind of AI book that’s used to teach children, and the stories are read aloud. But, they don’t have the AI read the stories, specifically because the children can tell when it’s automated, and won’t listen, so they have to use voice actors specifically for it, that are kept on payroll (in a manner of speaking).

    I used to think that AI could never replicate videos to a realistic degree but, uh, here we are. I wonder how long until it can read something aloud and pass as human.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I hate the way people just assume that technology gets infinitely better over time and there aren’t limitations on anything.

      You’re basically doing the same thing people in the 1950s used to do when they assumed we’d be flying to work on jetpacks by now.